Ap English Essay Lewis Lapham

The assertions do by Lewis Laphams Money and caste in America distinguishes the means of success and the requirements for heed from Americans to that of other strong societies. In his essay he defends that Americans show respect for those with a high sparing status go other nations feel art and intellect atomic number 18 warrant for respect. With this, he agrees with Henry Adams that Americans are greatly materialistic in the sense that they test to find success in wealth because they have been deflected by the prosecution of money.though the bringing close together that Americans favor and respect a high economic status is true, Laphams claim that they do so because they are socially forced to is not accurate because they suave have the ability to confound a choice. When Lapham states that Men remain free to rise or come up in the world, and if they fail it must be because they willed it so, he agrees with the clue that Americans see the rich as an example of being su fficient. This is because he feels that if Americans are not rich its because they chose not to be, this is inaccurate.First off, he contradicts the absurdity he finds in the idea that in the United states a rich mankind is perceived as being necessarily both good and reinvigorated He defends the respect toward superficiality. He then goes on to support the idea that Americans still have a choice in choosing the other counseling that he claims is being deflected by social standards. America has intellectuals and artists that deserve the respect they would receive in other nations, but instead their respect is addicted to those who dont deserve it.What Lapham should have said is that men are free to deny whatever standards are being set for them. Though in other societies it is easier to find the artistic and intellectual respect, there is still choice, which Lapham claims is not true. As shown through his double standards in Money and Class in America and in his denial of free w ill that every good hearted American would embrace, it is clear that he sides with the materialistic.